Comments for Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com Updates from the makers of Review Board Wed, 20 Jan 2021 01:45:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.14 Comment on Django Evolution 2.1.1: DecimalField fixes by Django Evolution 2.1.2: SQLite Fixes | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2021/01/17/django-evolution-2-1-1-decimalfield-fixes/#comment-196 Wed, 20 Jan 2021 01:45:35 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=1042#comment-196 […] may have just released 1.2.1, but we’re back with even more […]

]]> Comment on ChangeLog: April 2, 2020 — Catching Up by ChangeLog: May 21, 2020 | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2020/04/02/changelog-april-2-2020-catching-up/#comment-195 Thu, 21 May 2020 23:28:01 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=995#comment-195 […] talked before about the CANOSP student program we work with in Canada. Well, we’ve wrapped up our semester, […]

]]> Comment on An effective RBTools workflow for Git by Christian Hammond https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2015/01/26/an-effective-rbtools-workflow-for-git/#comment-194 Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:00:13 +0000 http://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=413#comment-194 In reply to Goran Zauhar.

Hi Goran,

I’m so sorry, our WordPress lumped this together with a bunch of spam posts that came in. Just saw this for the first time.

You may have already figured out a solution here, but basically, if you’re using multiple commits, you can specify a revision range, like:

rbt post -u my-parent..HEAD

That will update with a new diff representing that range of commits. It might have some trouble finding the right review request automatically, but it should ask you if one of the ones it found are correct (it tries to do a fuzzy text match using the summary and description of the review request and of the commits, and if it’s not 100% sure, it’ll look at your pending review requests and ask you.

We’ve recently redone this post, making it part of the official documentation: https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/rbtools/latest/workflows/git/

]]> Comment on ChangeLog: January 23, 2020 — Student Sprint and Django Upgrade by ChangeLog: February 20, 2020 — Accessibility, Student Demos | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2020/01/23/changelog-january-23-2020-student-sprint-and-django-upgrade/#comment-191 Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:39:43 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=938#comment-191 […] In an earlier ChangeLog, we announced our new team of students working on Review Board. The big focuses this semester are on keyboard accessibility and first-time setup improvements. […]

]]> Comment on RBCommons: User Roles and Billing Updates by ChangeLog: January 16, 2020 — Review Board Status and New Students | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2019/12/21/rbcommons-user-roles-and-billing-updates/#comment-189 Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:13:01 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=927#comment-189 […] Most of our attention of late has been on completing the remaining architectural work on Review Board 4.0 (Python 3 and Django 1.11 porting) and RBCommons user roles and billing updates. […]

]]> Comment on An effective RBTools workflow for Git by Goran Zauhar https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2015/01/26/an-effective-rbtools-workflow-for-git/#comment-188 Mon, 06 Jan 2020 13:30:12 +0000 http://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=413#comment-188 In section “Need to make some changes?” it has been mentioned it is users choice to amend existing commit or create new one with fixes. Updating review request with amended commit works without issues. But I am having troubles with updating review request with new commit with fixes. In your example what would ‘rbt post’ command look like if we chose to create new commit with fixes instead of amending existing one?

]]> Comment on ChangeLog: November 14, 2019 — Student Demos by ChangeLog: December 5, 2019 — Student Projects, Repository Config | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2019/11/14/changelog-november-14-2019-student-demos/#comment-186 Fri, 06 Dec 2019 02:31:21 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=904#comment-186 […] Last month, we talked a bit about the CANOSP student program run out of the University of Alberta, and showed off some of the work our CANOSP students have done on Review Board. […]

]]> Comment on ChangeLog: October 24, 2019 – The Python 3 and Django 1.11 Migration by ChangeLog – November 22, 2019 — Review Board 3.0.16 Status | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2019/10/24/changelog-october-24-2019/#comment-185 Fri, 22 Nov 2019 21:55:00 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=874#comment-185 […] we haven’t had a 3.0.x release in a while. There’s a few reasons for this, and we’ve gone over some of them before. In summary, we’ve been focusing primarily on getting Review Board 4.0 done and adding some […]

]]> Comment on ChangeLog: October 31, 2019 — DiffX, CSS Components, Admin UI by ChangeLog: November 7, 2019 — Multi-Repo Diffs, Admin UI, and RBCommons | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2019/10/31/changelog-october-31-2019/#comment-184 Fri, 08 Nov 2019 06:22:35 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=882#comment-184 […] talked last week about DiffX, our initiative to make diffs better. We’re hoping to start using DiffX from […]

]]> Comment on ChangeLog: October 24, 2019 – The Python 3 and Django 1.11 Migration by ChangeLog: October 31, 2019 — DiffX, CSS Components, Admin UI | Beanbag Blog https://blog.beanbaginc.com/2019/10/24/changelog-october-24-2019/#comment-183 Thu, 31 Oct 2019 21:28:52 +0000 https://blog.beanbaginc.com/?p=874#comment-183 […] Last week, we talked about the work on Python 3 and Django 1.11, and some of the huge tasks we’ve had to work through to support this. […]

]]>